|
|
Post by rex4842 on Jul 17, 2005 16:54:58 GMT -8
Because his username is very.......inapropriate
|
|
|
|
Post by Mdiddy on Jul 17, 2005 16:56:18 GMT -8
That's not a word....
|
|
|
|
Post by rex4842 on Jul 17, 2005 16:57:37 GMT -8
no go to new users at the bottom of the forum and it will sayTotal
Members: 32
Newest Member: yoohavenowang
Your Instant Messages: 0 New: 0
Total Viewing In Boards: 1
|
|
|
|
Post by Mdiddy on Jul 17, 2005 17:57:42 GMT -8
Yeah, I know.
I'm saying "inproappropriate" isn't a word....
|
|
Zane
Regular Member
[M:0]
Posts: 478
|
Post by Zane on Jul 17, 2005 18:30:59 GMT -8
inapropriate
|
|
|
|
Post by rex4842 on Jul 17, 2005 19:29:57 GMT -8
happy now?
|
|
|
|
Post by Isiah Zombie on Jul 18, 2005 7:16:53 GMT -8
Who is this wangless member? I shall find out!
|
|
|
|
Post by Caboose on Jul 18, 2005 8:59:26 GMT -8
how can a member be wangless, a member, by definition, IS a wang, and if a member has no wang, it is nothing
|
|
|
|
Post by Caboose on Jul 18, 2005 9:00:30 GMT -8
and anyway, c ock changes to wang by the censor, so it must a fine username, unless he had a name of youhavenoc ock
|
|
|
|
Post by Isiah Zombie on Jul 18, 2005 9:40:02 GMT -8
I can't find any info on him.
|
|
|
|
Post by rex4842 on Jul 18, 2005 12:06:36 GMT -8
DAMNIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111111111
|
|
|
|
Post by Isiah Zombie on Jul 18, 2005 12:40:05 GMT -8
Only his email.
|
|
|
|
Post by rex4842 on Jul 18, 2005 13:01:32 GMT -8
hhhhhhhmmmmmmm
|
|
|
|
Post by Caboose on Jul 18, 2005 13:09:51 GMT -8
meh, lets all exalt him alot, then ban him next time he gets on
why?
because there is no reason to
|
|
|
|
Post by rex4842 on Jul 18, 2005 13:22:30 GMT -8
good plan
|
|
